Now, there is not necessarily anything wrong with this, I just think that authors who are doing this are missing possible traffic and/or clients. Such reference boxes will only gain their site ratings in a... Clicking linklicious free trial probably provides suggestions you should tell your dad.
I run a report directory on my site, and I am seeing a growing quantity of articles being submitted, solely for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is most likely because of the growing quantity of PLR articles and material that is becoming available.
Now, there is not necessarily anything wrong with this, I only believe that authors who are doing this are missing possible traffic and/or clients. Such source boxes will simply benefit their site rankings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine.
Is this a bad thing? No. My co-worker learned about linklicious reviews by searching Google Books. Where they're losing out can be as follows.
Much of the traffic to my report directory comes from search engines, by people trying to find info on a specific subject. Now, this user types in their key-words, clicks o-n the search box, and is given a listing of related sites. They chose one, and are taken up to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, think 'This is interesting' and go to the author's resource field by the end of the article to see what else they've to say on this issue. There, they find a link to your site marketing mobile ringtones. May be the reader likely to be impressed, or interested in this? Not very likely. This novel linklicious.me tutorial link has uncountable forceful lessons for the purpose of it. They would like to check out snowboarding, maybe not personalize their phone. I really believe one of three things can happen then:
The audience leaves the entire site in disgust.
The viewer clicks on the link to a relevant report.
The viewer clicks on the relevant Google AdSense (or similar contextual promotion) offer.
They don't click the author's resource link. That's a potential customer lost, quite probably permanently.
Yes, put a link in to your site in the reference field, but most article websites let several links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s linked to the article subject also, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the client.
'But my site does not have such a thing regarding that matter onto it'!
Then add a thing that does. Increase a report directory, and have the reference field saying 'To learn more articles on this subject, go here.' Add a web service, and have the written text say 'To see links to sites on this issue, click here.' Or simply visit Click-bank, look for related jobs, and have a link to them, with the link saying something like 'If you want to find out more on this issue, obtain this item.' Preferably, not a direct connect to the item, but a cloaked or redirected one. If you think you know anything at all, you will maybe claim to discover about is linklicious safe.
By doing this, you still get that url to your site that you were after actually, but, furthermore, you've the opportunity to earn money from your reader in a brand new way. A situation. Plus, you do not look like somebody basically distributing purchased information on any subject just for the benefit of the backlink it will give you. An infinitely more professional look. Isn't it worth taking the time to create better use of one's resource package?.